I did my first Sub-Q Test-E shot yesterday after reading this thread and it went well. No pain, no lump, no bleeding.. much more pleasant than my delt.
I did my first Sub-Q Test-E shot yesterday after reading this thread and it went well. No pain, no lump, no bleeding.. much more pleasant than my delt.
Still, your experience is to be listened to. Just switching to sub-q because it seems to work and why not anyway is not reason enough to do so. Scientific evidence, experimental proof, BW after a few weeks is necessary to confirm that sub-q is "just as effective" as the proven IM method. Aside from the fact that IM takes more volume more safely than sub-q, there must be good reason it has been the only recommended method for injecting oil-based gear since, well, a long time ago.
Solo
Last edited by Solo59; 13-03-2009 at 04:35 PM.
would it be wise to subq inject test suspension? or would i get major irritation from the large particles?? i am feeling like a voodoo doll.......
next cycle I am ordering suspension to do sub q for pre workout jabs
sweet...i will try later today
Done the suspension SQ several times. No issues,some redness around the site but only the day after and then it was gone.
You felt the suspension SQ as quick as IM?
No. It appeared to come on slower then when I shot IM.
i just shot .5mls of test susp in my stomach....and I ain't gonna lie, it did sting like a lil bastard......but only for like 10-15 minutes......