Whatever you fat old man. Why don't you have another meltdown and quit the board again...for an hour.
You're grasping at straws John, I only have one account; which is all I need to see you start shit in every thread. You're a parasite to the board and contribute nothing.![]()
I'm not freaking out... I just hate seeing someone who clearly created a new account just so they could post this crap. Yeah making gear is against the law and whether it be 3 months 33 months or 33 years the people taking the risk know the risk... Its not new news...
This illusion guy I have ZERO respect for because of the child porn. I'm from NS and if he goes to Dorchester Pen I know for a fact he will get rapped in there... My mother was a county sheriff back home... I'm all too familiar with stories of child molesters and child porn offenders that go to Dorchester.
What do you mean crap??? What he said is true and thats it!! i realy dont understand your thinking.
By the way cool the **** down!!
The powers that be are saying that in this case the child porn was insignificant however given the current climate concerning the offence they had to hand him a token sentence for it. Two months is a nearly freebie and two months concurrent is just about a pass. This was all about the steroids.
They didn't have to nail him on the procedes of crime and seize his assets (he was getting a lengthy incarceration term) UNLESS they wanted to set a precedent AND they have their eyes sighted on bigger fish. Mr. Tanner didn't really own **** all and housing prices in NS are not like they are in other parts of Canada.
So asset forfeiture and significant incarceration for schedule 4 substances (or schedule f or whatever they are calling them these days). Hmmm???
I known of many WITH previous records, charged with what this community believed was far more serious offences, who received less time and no attempt at asset seizure. Some of those offences were drug related, extortion or weapons.