Quote Originally Posted by fitnurss View Post
Talo, it depends on what she is looking for. There are advantages/disadvantages of both routes. The pain and recovery time sub-muscular is much greater than that of above the muscle. Personally, I absolutely hate that "ball" look that you often see when fitness competitors with over-the-muscle implants get when really lean. Plus, there's always a higher risk for capsular contracture.
I went a kind of in-between route - sub-fascial...it's not really under the muscle, but more supported and covered than it would be with the traditional "over the muscle" procedure. I had very little pain during my recovery and was back to training heavy around 4 weeks post-op.

To answer OP's question, if you're above the muscle and you feel like you're healed and your surgeon has given you the green llight, I see no reason why you can't be training heavy again 4-6 weeks post op. Just make sure to ease into it!
I thought that over the muscle implants could shift as well that is the main reason I haven't gone heavy since I got them.

And yes 600cc's before I started competing I was 36D last contest I did before I got my boobs I was an almost A cup. I had a lot of extra skin so it was really easy for the PS to slip the gel implants in he went thru the nipple wasn't sure if he would be able to or not but it worked out. With sub-fascial and under the muscle is it an anchor insesion under the breast fold? If so how is that for healing?