OMG....
YES Nina, Dianne & Myself have all been reading this thread!
Printable View
OMG....
YES Nina, Dianne & Myself have all been reading this thread!
Now it's negative.... Ok. I guess one can't make a suggestion that will benefit all without it being deemed as negative. Wow.
My comments about "green" competitors wasn't about the tanners. I know full well that if a competitor doesn't prep their skin correctly then problems will arise. I am about options. What will the new tanners be using? I think Jan Tana's products. With options then problems are less likely to happen. LA you are reading too much into this. Instead of getting your back up against the wall you should be open to suggestions...and not view them as slander, a negative comment...etc.
Nate...because there isn't.
But anyone familiar with the OPA would know this so then it would stand to reason that because it's so well known it would be within the OPA bylaws.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean Summers
A perfect tan comes from proper skin prep.... some peoples PH levels are much different then others. IF a client brings me a product to airbrush them with then I will for sure use it. YES we will be using the Jan tana product and I have also a new organic product.
Dan, I don't think Lori Ann is getting her back up against the wall...she is being pushed there. You out right call the OPA Scum! The OPA is like a family and the want and NEED positive people within there organization to make it continue to grow.....badgering, name calling and slander are all unhealthy and unproductive. Whats done is done for 2012, lets please move on....
Could someone please show me where I said this....FFS. Geesh.Quote:
You out right call the OPA Scum
NOT you, Nate...sorry my apologies
Prove me wrong by telling me WHERE it states in the OPA bylaws the vendor bidding process and timelines for vendor bid submissions?Quote:
Originally Posted by PrincessPamela
Forgive me if i don't suckhole along and play nice. When i see something that seems to stink i call a spade a spade until proven otherwise.
bla bla bla i say... heres where i see a problem.. a BIG one.. i agree with Dan... Options 4 athletes.... i predict the potential is very high that the demand placed on ONE tanner will be too much... with 100+ competitors... i smell disaster if alot choose this option...and there is ONLY 1.... unless they charge close to $200... then im sure that wont be an issue
pretty sure for one show last yr athletes were scrambling...a tanner was MIA... they were late....ect ect..im sure as "official" tanner there will be accountabilty... but you can only do so much.. i have no clue how long a process it is to tan one person...
having said all that... IF the athletes are number one concern..for BOTH... OPA and pamela... could both, posssibly agree..to drop "official" tanner status, and allow dan and the other company to attend shows to BETTER SERVE competitiors?? it sounds win win and logical... who would be losing here???
egos aside.. no right or wrong...would that no make perfect sense?
phats
So after rereading. The 1 upside is "pro quality tans" willbe at ALL shows...
Also... It wasn't dan that said OPA was pure scum, as he was confused where that came from.. See post #1..lol ;)