The official reports state child porn, but I don't remember seeing rec drugs.
Printable View
Yes however his 33 month sentence relates ONLY to the steroid charges. He was not found in possession of any recreationa drugs. He was caught up in an operation where others where charged with recreational drug offences and weapons offences. Mr. Tanner was tried and sentenced on steroid related offences only, and if any of you way the indictment and the charges the crown leveled at him, beyond those of the criminal code.....YIKES.
The child porn is a totally separate trial and is still pending.
The crown wanted to set a precendent here and they did just that. The next name branded lab to be busted better have Mr. Greenspan on retainer or be prepared for a significant time away from their loved ones.
You gotta wonder how much this man's reputation played out in the sentencing. I do understand what your saying, that the charges were for the steroids only. But its a fact of life that your reputation precedes you.
Uh, no. You are completely wrong. 33 months for the steroids charges and two months concurrent for child porn.
http://thechronicleherald.ca/NovaScotia/1105626.html
Times are chagnign bros. Doedsn't matter if he was a piece of shit, it can be used as a precendent in court and . . yeah. It's not the freebee game it was.