Short cycles?

[Avitoholis]

What are the opinions here on short cycles 2-6 weeks. They seem to be very popular with some and others seem to think they are a complete waste of time and gear. The appeal seems to be short recovery time which obviously has advantages. Also it sounds appealing to gain lets say 3lbs lean muscle per cycle over 6-7 cycles in the run of a year, slow steady gains don't sound that bad. Anyway, I know this has been addressed several times but i'd like to hear some new opinions.

[nitrous]

i believe for a short cycles its more like 6 weeks to maybe 8.. not as short as 2.. and i hear they are good.. i ran one cycle for 4 weeks a few years ago and it went decent

[JonnyO]

I'm not a fan of the longer cycles. I have done the 6 weeks cycles and they were good. Now I prefer something in the 8-12 week max range.

[BritishColumbian]

I find that a longer cycle(16 to 20 weeks) of test only to be far more beneficial than anything short. I think the idea of getting your test levels up and then maintaining them at a nice even level for 20 weeks gives your body enough time to really benefit from all that Test has to offer. I ran a short cycle once and was not impressed at all, It wasnt worth the pain of pinning.

[tex]

you gotta run test suspension for a 4-6 week cycle to be effective imo.....have fun pinning twice a day!! it gets old after a few weeks and you feel like a pin cushion......