Log in

View Full Version : Smile! You might be on Google Street View



pinhead
25-03-2009, 07:13 PM
Strange-looking vans and cars are prowling the streets of Montreal and 10 major Canadian cities and taking pictures of homes, laneways, yards and people as part of the controversial "Street View" feature offered by Google Inc.

The feature has raised the ire of privacy watchdogs all over the world for its candid and sometimes controversial images.

The feature allows someone using Google Maps or Google Earth to click on a street or a building and see a picture of the area. The service's ability to allow onlookers to swivel 360 degrees gives Internet voyeurs the ability to take a virtual stroll of neighbourhoods.

However, the technology also has captured images of people coming out of strip clubs, suntanning on their back decks, sleeping next to trash bins or arguing with tow-truck drivers.

The service has been contentious since it was first introduced in the United States in 2007. Such U.S. privacy watchdogs as the Electronic Frontier Foundation and People for Internet Responsibility have raised questions about the intrusiveness of Street View.

The service's expansion to Canada now sees cars and vans, outfitted with a tall pole that has 30 special cameras attached to the top, driving through Montreal, Quebec City, Ottawa, Toronto, Edmonton, Vancouver, Calgary, Halifax, Saint John, Saskatoon and Winnipeg.

The company said it has already started collecting images and will release those for viewing within the coming weeks.

Media lawyer Mark Bantey, who also represents The Gazette in legal matters, predicts "Google will have a big problem in Quebec."

He explained Quebec has the most stringent privacy laws of both Canada and the United States.

"Google will be exposed to lawsuits in Quebec if they publish pictures of people without consent," Bantey said. "It's not like that in the rest of Canada or even in the U.S."

Bantey explained in a landmark 1998 case that went to the Supreme Court of Canada, a 17-year-old girl successfully sued a magazine for $2,000 in damages for taking a photograph of her while she was in a public space on Ste. Catherine St., and publishing it on the front page without her consent.

Bantey said people must show damages when they claim their privacy has been violated.

"But in this case, I think the girl merely said that her classmates laughed at her," Bantey said.

Bantey said Google could get around the law, by blurring the faces of people to render them unrecognizable.

Elizabeth Denham, of the office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, said Google has, indeed, agreed to blur the faces of anyone caught in a picture. The company also has agreed to blur the licence plates of vehicles.

She said doing this will help to protect people, especially people who may be in a sensitive location, such as women's shelter or an abortion clinic.

The company also has offered to remove images people find offensive.

Ritch
25-03-2009, 09:42 PM
I think this is a crappy idea.

Gettin'r'round
26-03-2009, 08:35 AM
If you had a free day one could have some really fun times with homemade signs amoung other things...

pinhead
26-03-2009, 09:13 AM
Would be fun to become a streaker with a mask :D

cdnsoldier
26-03-2009, 09:15 AM
Google is getting out of hand. Pretty soon you'll be caught cheating on your wife via google.

Gettin'r'round
26-03-2009, 09:18 AM
Check your house on google earth and check out who's parking in your driveway lol...

dainbramaged
26-03-2009, 09:24 AM
Makes you wonder too if they're just going to have a stationary vehicle parked somewhere (which could lead to interesting developments with people coming up or approaching the vehicle) or something more mobile? If it's mobile, which I'd suspect?, then what a HUGE waste of fuel just so some online voyeurs can see what's going on on any one given street. Of course, they could put cameras everywhere (CCTV), then we'd be like Britain. Maybe then we could become a real police state....

cdnsoldier
26-03-2009, 10:17 AM
Makes you wonder too if they're just going to have a stationary vehicle parked somewhere (which could lead to interesting developments with people coming up or approaching the vehicle) or something more mobile? If it's mobile, which I'd suspect?, then what a HUGE waste of fuel just so some online voyeurs can see what's going on on any one given street. Of course, they could put cameras everywhere (CCTV), then we'd be like Britain. Maybe then we could become a real police state....



Ok but not everone in Britain has access to those tapes. Only if a crime is committed. The google stuff anyone can look it up. How far will google go?

dainbramaged
27-03-2009, 09:05 AM
Ok but not everone in Britain has access to those tapes. Only if a crime is committed. The google stuff anyone can look it up. How far will google go?

That's kind of my point, in a sense. The idea that it's simply like an Orwellian big brother watching you. I wonder which gated communities or celebrities DON'T have this service in their area(s)?

kawikaratekid
27-03-2009, 09:40 AM
How far are we in society going to let this go? Technology is doing nothing but taking away our privacy. Soon enough will be walking around with chips that the "man" will install at birth.
Step it up decision makers! Create some sort of law to protect the privacy of the average man. That's your job!

cdnsoldier
27-03-2009, 10:32 AM
How far are we in society going to let this go? Technology is doing nothing but taking away our privacy. Soon enough will be walking around with chips that the "man" will install at birth.
Step it up decision makers! Create some sort of law to protect the privacy of the average man. That's your job!


Judging by the last 10 years and the rape on our freedom- as far as they want to take it. No one will do anything more than bitch on the internet or call up a radio show.

natenator
27-03-2009, 10:33 AM
man I hope that caught me when I'm outside a nightclub gettin skull :D

pinhead
27-03-2009, 10:37 AM
As long as it's outside my home and on public grounds, it doesn't bother me. That is the limit for me.

natenator
27-03-2009, 10:39 AM
As long as it's outside my home and on public grounds, it doesn't bother me. That is the limit for me.
I don't care if they find a way to film me inside my home :D