UkrainianGuy
14-02-2009, 01:12 AM
Sunday, November 02, 2008
http://x.myspace.com/images/spacer.gifHow to handle checkpoints, "police" and corporate officials. Commercial Liens.
It's a difficult thing to comprehend the nature of freedom. We have been brainwashed our whole lives. It doesn't matter if it's an internal checkpoint of any country, polic(y)e enforcers of corporate de facto government statutory laws, government officials, or even civilian "police" that are to be set up to patrol the land.... there can be no jurisdiction of any of these corporate positions over any man or women. And there can only be limited circumstances where they could have any jurisdiction over a natural person of the Common Law (if they intentionally hurt someone else, and an affidavit is filed). The problem is that we have been brainwashed to think that we are the limited liability commercial IDentification we have registered with federal or state government. We believe that we are this entity at law, the all capital letters NAME we see on our ID. This ID is not us, and we are not that ID. But it is only a legal entity on a piece of paper to which corporate law applies.
Basic Jurisdictions:
1. Man or woman of the natural law.
-free of all man's law.
-absolute rights
2. Natural person of the Republic.
-the man or woman as part of the Republic or Common Law.
-subject to probable cause of the Constitution where a criminal affidavit is filed by a living injured party with the state.
-requires a warrant to be presented by a police officer or sheriff, acting under his oath of office, the warrant which must have an accompanying affidavit of probable cause of the living injured person attached, for the natural person to examine.
3. Artificial person NAME of the UNITED STATES.
-we unknowingly act as a NAME, "our" IDentification, a fiction at law.
-and by default, police officers are unlawfully acting outside their oath of office, unless we hold them to it.
-this NAME is subject to "reasonable suspicion" of probable cause and to corporate statutes where there is no living injured party.
-this is where we get lost and where government and police take advantage of us.
-traffic, tax, gun, drug and family enforcement laws... etc.
-this law is by assumption only, there are no common law facts to support these charges.
-criminal charges on the NAME are not claims based on facts at the Common Law.
-if a natural person were to plead guilty to the facts of a criminal case, not pleading guilty to the charges, there would be nothing to be guilty of because there are no Common Law facts with charges on the NAME.
-the same as if one were to plead "guilty without prejudice" (guilty but reserving rights of the natural person at the Common Law) - means that the case would have to proceed at the Common Law if they want to continue - and since there are no facts at the Common Law where there is no injury againt a living person, the case cannot proceed at the Common Law, the law where the living man of the Republic stands.
Example: Checkpoints.
Our fear based gut feeling is that we have to show identification to police officers when they ask. Nothing could be further from the truth, whether in our house, walking outside or travelling in our car.
Here is a beautiful set of videos that show one way of handling the new internal checkpoints that are springing up across the United States of America. These corporate "officers" are no more than civilian police. Watch how they try to identify that the individual traveling in the automobile is a 'citizen' (someone subject to their commercial jurisdiction). Watch how the guy handles it.
The most important part of this video is how the guy avoids answering any questions at all, especially that of whether he's a citizen.
-First he tries to identify the officer implicated in stopping him.
-She cannot present probable cause. Instead asks him questions about citizenship to see if he is of her jurisdiction to act within admiralty commercial law on the 'vehicle' or the 'driver'.
-Although we have been brainwashed to think so, he knows he has no obligation to identify himself.
-He continues to ask what is the scope of the powers granted to her to stop him, and if he is being detained (unlawfully). He knows that she has no power because he has not violated anyone's rights and knows it's unlikely that there is a lawful warrant for him based on probable cause and signed by a magistrate. He knows that she cannot lawfully detain
him.
-He knows that any scope of powers granted to her to stop anyone like this without probable cause is unlawful.
-She continues to try to identify him, to get him to voluntarily submit that he is a 'corporate citizen of the UNITED STATES' with which she would assume over him (by showing ID).
-Notice how she finally backs off when he says 'You can ask anything you want.' -At this point she realizes that there is nothing she can ask that will get him to answer that he is a citizen and volunteer himself into their jurisdiction. She knows that he knows the law, and knows she cannot trick him to voluntarily submit to her.
Questions:
1. What is the purpose of the stop?
2. What is the (lawful) scope of the stop?
3. Am I being detained?
4. If I am not being detained, am I free to go?
5. Are you refusing to let me go on my way?
6. If so then I am being detained then?
7. If I am being detained, what is your suspicion and what is your probable cause?
Checkpoint USA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6uw7506xMw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8hcf1flFHA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irYJVn2k6zU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TuIwz8ddAYo
Obedience Training
-training people to be obedient to any cop anywhere.
-this is totally based on fear and our ignorance of the common law of the Republic.
-This is an amazing video because the corporate immigration officers will not let the author proceed on his way, yet they will not tell him that he is being detained or for what probable cause.
-everything is in a sort of limbo, as the officers try to get the man to incriminate himself. The entire stop is both illegal and unlawful.
-they try to trick him into feeling responsible for backing up traffic when it's the immigration officers that are refusing to let him to go on his way without any cause.
-it becomes easy to see that internal checkpoints based on corporate statutes (and corporate statutes themselves) are voluntary.
-they are waiting for the author to incriminate himself or volunteer himself through some sort of agreement or consent into their assumption of jurisdiction.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDLlEh0x2XA
Limbo
-this video highlights well the state of limbo that we are in when we face these checkpoints. This is where if we know our natural rights, and natural person rights too, we know that officers at these checkpoints are just waiting for us to voluntarily identify ourselves as an
artificial person US citizen (slave) or to agree to their demands.
-notice the author simply says "Let me know when I am free to go." He says that without ever answering any of their questions.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHqpuVetLeo
-the state of limbo is where the fear factor comes in. Who is going to give in first? Are we going to be in fear and voluntarily submit to their demands, or are we going to ask the right questions and by doing so, force them to capitulate that they do not have jurisdiction without our agreement or consent, and arrive at the conclusion that there is no point to continue.
-the point is not to panic. You truly have to internalize that:
1. a man or woman can deny consent to be searched.
2. that there needs to be probable cause for a natural person of the Republic to be searched,
3. and that even for the artificial person NAME under corporate statutes of the UNITED STATES (or any country), there needs to be "reasonable suspicion" of probable cause that a statute was broken, in order for that legal entity to be searched.
WITH ANY POLICE OR OFFICER:
1. Get their full NAMES and ADDRESS OF BUSINESS.
2. Avoid answering any questions if you can. Ask questions instead.
-as Robert Menard points out in his videos, as long as you are ascertaining the purpose of things, you cannot be lawfully imposed upon.
2. Tell 'em you are a private man or woman if you have to, and not a person at law.
3. If they violate you, a commercial lien of your common law Name on their commercial NAME, listing any bond they have, and any private property, as surety.
No different from how to deal with current police or any checkpoints.
As long as there isn't a complete state of 'lawlessness' then it should work. I'm not even sure if the true common law of universal consent (Bouvier) is ever suspended when at a state of war. Probably not. Not for men and women. The de jure United States of America, the Constitutional Republic, otherwise known as the Common Law (big C big L) is a civil government in civil contract with natural persons and/or citizens of the Republic (legal entities representing the man or woman of a Constitutional Republic - see Chisholm v. Georgia). The current de facto United States (Organic Act of Washington DC 1871) is a corporation in civil contract with the artificial person created with Social Security. Martial law, a declared state of civil government, can't really affect the common law as far as I can tell... only the contract between the artificial political entities called governments, and natural and artificial persons at law (fictions at law, assumptions of who we are other than men and women under God). And it certainly can't affect the natural law where all men, women and children live under God.
According to Winston Shrout, the Constitution (a filing of bankruptcy of the original colonies) evaporated completely in 1999, but that doesn't stop people from commercial liens if necessary. The Constitution was basically a civil contract governing the common law, but separate from the common law itself. Since police states, and state of war, are both of civil, or admiralty law, and acting on persons at law, the true common law, and it's available protections, should still be in effect.
Contrary to what one might believe, being identified as a 'citizen' of the federal corporation UNITED STATES is not a good thing. Based upon the work of people like Robert-Arthur:Menard, Eric WhoRU, Randy Kelton and Marc Stevens, we know that the scope of power granted to government and public officials, by authority of The People, to perform any act on any individual is no more than the authority that one man/woman can have over that individual. By nature and by God, a man or woman cannot have authority over someone else. Ever. For natural persons at law, and artificial persons at law, both legal entity representations of men or corporations under civil government, assumptions are made that change things at law if we do not rebut them as living beings.
The jurisdiction of those acting through government/court/police positions is that job description, based on the Constitutional contract establishing the Common Law of the land of Probable Cause, to which they have sworn an oath to uphold. Thus those people working as government officials, courts and police cannot be granted the jurisdiction to act upon someone, anyone, without probable cause (a criminal affidavit by one of The People, charging a violation of aright and evidence supporting this charge) that a crime has already occurred, as originated by someone asking for those working for government to act on his/her behalf. In other words, the jurisdiction of those acting for government and on behalf of The People (the natural persons - real men and women in the society of the Republic) is to uphold the law of the land. And this jurisdiction, this power, to act upon someone alleged to have committed a crime against us or our property can come only from one of The People, which occurs when we file a criminal complaint alleging a violation of a right.
So no man, woman or child, and no property, can fall under the jurisdiction of those working for government without their consent. All function of a man in society must be by consent (See Chisholm v. Georgia). Jurisdiction is only the power granted to government, courts, or police by a natural person accuser, and claimed against another natural person of the Republic. It's only with a sworn affidavit from someone, and with evidence supporting a probable cause of injury to a person, that they can be granted the jurisdiction on behalf of The People to seize those accused, or to seize things that are involved in the violation of an accuser's God-given rights. It is not within the scope of the power granted to them for those working on behalf of the government to detain or arrest any natural "person" or anything to which they have not been granted jurisdiction through probable cause decision by a magistrate and a 'lawful warrant'.
It is my understanding that traveling freely on the land is a privilege granted by God to all men and women, as well as an absolute, natural and common law right for natural persons of "civil" common law contracts such as the Constitution for the United States of America, (not a privilege granted by government), protected by the true common law of universal agreement, and also the civil contract of Common Law of Constitution Republics on natural persons at law. It is not unless we volunteer ourselves to act act in commerce as a legal entity artificial person registered with a NAME that looks like ours - the all caps straw man - in admiralty law of corporate governments, with a driver's licence for our body, and a registration for our cars, that we fall under the assumption of being in a jurisdiction of the commercial/admiralty nature of government. (ie: speeding, DUI, checkpoints). And even this assumption is unlawful without our agreement and consent.
Officers have the duty to identify themselves to men and women when asked for us to be able to ascertain the purpose of the stop. This changes for 'persons at law' depending on the statutes of the state or provincial jurisdiction. During any stop, regular or checkpoint, contrary to what we have been taught to believe, they have not already been granted jurisdiction to detain or arrest anyone on the road who has not submitted themselves to their commercial jurisdiction,if a violation of a right has not been committed to which they have a lawful warrant signed by a magistrate (a complaint and evidence submitted to a magistrate to determine probable cause). Searches and seizures on 'persons at law' must be done by lawful warrant fulfilling lawful criteria. Men and women can deny consent to be searched, or waive that benefit.
There is no lawful authority for anyone in government to oblige a man or woman to show IDentification. There are limited times, without probable cause, when police can ask someone under the assumption of being a 'person' at law (Terry Stops etc...) for their Name only, and it's an 'obligation' to give it.
COMMERCIAL LIENS (enforcement of commercial claims of injury against us):
LIENS (Commercial vs Statutory) and LEVIES of bonds and private property of police.
-commercial liens are of the Common Law and are more powerful that statutory liens in admiralty jurisdiction. Attorneys and government officials would prefer you do not know about these liens.
-are done on the commercial title to something such as a policeman's bond or his private property.
-the person you are liening better have a bond, or you can lien their private property.
-liens are a claim.... versus a levy on the surety that you are claiming for damages.
-these liens differ from statutory suing, or liens under statutory law, because they are filled out in affidavit form under full commercial liability as a man or natural person.
-we lien, as a natural person Upper and Lower case name, the all caps NAMES of those who violate us, or companies and corporations including police, attorneys, judges and government officials.
-government corporations and police and judges acting as corporate officials are civilly DEAD entities so....
-a lien of a commercial title by a natural person of the Common Law is superior to a statutory lien by a corporation on a commercial title.
-we can place liens on the NAMES, or the Names, of public officials, banks,
attorneys, firms, for a) torts or b) breech of contract.
-strict liability commercial liens from the Common Law can only be over ridden by a Common Law jury, unless we release the lien ourselves.
-commercial liens are placed on the legal title to things (all caps NAMES of persons, NAMES of property)
-we can use commercial liens to secure the legal title to property that we
already have (the title that is co-owned by government and that gives
them a legal claim to the property)
-we can use commercial liens to arrest the public hazard bonds, or private property of public officials who are violating our legal rights as men and women, or as natural persons at the Common Law.
-if they don't have bonds then we can lien their private property
COMMERCIAL LIENS (how to enforce injury we endure)
A] Affidavit of Obligation (give 3 days for response)
-we are certifying to the truth of the thing.
-done under full commercial liability as a man or woman.
-sent by registered mail.
-this will become the law of the contract upon which they will default.
-usually they do not respond.
-when they do it is usually as a legal corporate DEAD entity and any "facts" contained therein are not facts at the Common Law.
1] Parties involved
-Claimant: the Upper and Lower case name (as us) doing business as ALL CAPS NAME (we use).
-Debtor: the NAME or Name of the person you are claiming against.
-their business NAME.
-or their Upper and Lower case name (the man who violated us) doing business as ALL CAPS NAME (their artificial person, or, all caps officer they work as, or, all caps district attorney they work as, or, all caps CEO of company they work as.. etc).
2] Proof of the allegation.
-is their non-response.
-their non-response to our notarized presentments of allegations is the proof.
3] Ledgering/Accounting
-monetary value of injury
4] What will be the surety
-eg: his public hazard bond
-private property
-all real property
5] Certification
-I do hereby certify upon my full commercial liability that the above is true complete and correct.
6] Signature
7] Proof of Mailing
-proof of mailing, and contents mailed, and the return receipt.
B] Notice of Fault/Opportunity to Cure (give 3 days for response)
C] Notice of Default (give 3 days for response)
-a Notice of default is ex-parte
-ie: we do not have to send them a copy of this
Levy
-after a lien has been secured we can collect from the insurance company that holds a public officials bond, or indemnify (hold harmless) and appoint a peace officer to levy the private property of the public or agency official in question.
Co-Claimants
Witnessing
-two or three private verifiers is equivalent to a prothonotary.
http://x.myspace.com/images/spacer.gifHow to handle checkpoints, "police" and corporate officials. Commercial Liens.
It's a difficult thing to comprehend the nature of freedom. We have been brainwashed our whole lives. It doesn't matter if it's an internal checkpoint of any country, polic(y)e enforcers of corporate de facto government statutory laws, government officials, or even civilian "police" that are to be set up to patrol the land.... there can be no jurisdiction of any of these corporate positions over any man or women. And there can only be limited circumstances where they could have any jurisdiction over a natural person of the Common Law (if they intentionally hurt someone else, and an affidavit is filed). The problem is that we have been brainwashed to think that we are the limited liability commercial IDentification we have registered with federal or state government. We believe that we are this entity at law, the all capital letters NAME we see on our ID. This ID is not us, and we are not that ID. But it is only a legal entity on a piece of paper to which corporate law applies.
Basic Jurisdictions:
1. Man or woman of the natural law.
-free of all man's law.
-absolute rights
2. Natural person of the Republic.
-the man or woman as part of the Republic or Common Law.
-subject to probable cause of the Constitution where a criminal affidavit is filed by a living injured party with the state.
-requires a warrant to be presented by a police officer or sheriff, acting under his oath of office, the warrant which must have an accompanying affidavit of probable cause of the living injured person attached, for the natural person to examine.
3. Artificial person NAME of the UNITED STATES.
-we unknowingly act as a NAME, "our" IDentification, a fiction at law.
-and by default, police officers are unlawfully acting outside their oath of office, unless we hold them to it.
-this NAME is subject to "reasonable suspicion" of probable cause and to corporate statutes where there is no living injured party.
-this is where we get lost and where government and police take advantage of us.
-traffic, tax, gun, drug and family enforcement laws... etc.
-this law is by assumption only, there are no common law facts to support these charges.
-criminal charges on the NAME are not claims based on facts at the Common Law.
-if a natural person were to plead guilty to the facts of a criminal case, not pleading guilty to the charges, there would be nothing to be guilty of because there are no Common Law facts with charges on the NAME.
-the same as if one were to plead "guilty without prejudice" (guilty but reserving rights of the natural person at the Common Law) - means that the case would have to proceed at the Common Law if they want to continue - and since there are no facts at the Common Law where there is no injury againt a living person, the case cannot proceed at the Common Law, the law where the living man of the Republic stands.
Example: Checkpoints.
Our fear based gut feeling is that we have to show identification to police officers when they ask. Nothing could be further from the truth, whether in our house, walking outside or travelling in our car.
Here is a beautiful set of videos that show one way of handling the new internal checkpoints that are springing up across the United States of America. These corporate "officers" are no more than civilian police. Watch how they try to identify that the individual traveling in the automobile is a 'citizen' (someone subject to their commercial jurisdiction). Watch how the guy handles it.
The most important part of this video is how the guy avoids answering any questions at all, especially that of whether he's a citizen.
-First he tries to identify the officer implicated in stopping him.
-She cannot present probable cause. Instead asks him questions about citizenship to see if he is of her jurisdiction to act within admiralty commercial law on the 'vehicle' or the 'driver'.
-Although we have been brainwashed to think so, he knows he has no obligation to identify himself.
-He continues to ask what is the scope of the powers granted to her to stop him, and if he is being detained (unlawfully). He knows that she has no power because he has not violated anyone's rights and knows it's unlikely that there is a lawful warrant for him based on probable cause and signed by a magistrate. He knows that she cannot lawfully detain
him.
-He knows that any scope of powers granted to her to stop anyone like this without probable cause is unlawful.
-She continues to try to identify him, to get him to voluntarily submit that he is a 'corporate citizen of the UNITED STATES' with which she would assume over him (by showing ID).
-Notice how she finally backs off when he says 'You can ask anything you want.' -At this point she realizes that there is nothing she can ask that will get him to answer that he is a citizen and volunteer himself into their jurisdiction. She knows that he knows the law, and knows she cannot trick him to voluntarily submit to her.
Questions:
1. What is the purpose of the stop?
2. What is the (lawful) scope of the stop?
3. Am I being detained?
4. If I am not being detained, am I free to go?
5. Are you refusing to let me go on my way?
6. If so then I am being detained then?
7. If I am being detained, what is your suspicion and what is your probable cause?
Checkpoint USA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6uw7506xMw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8hcf1flFHA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irYJVn2k6zU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TuIwz8ddAYo
Obedience Training
-training people to be obedient to any cop anywhere.
-this is totally based on fear and our ignorance of the common law of the Republic.
-This is an amazing video because the corporate immigration officers will not let the author proceed on his way, yet they will not tell him that he is being detained or for what probable cause.
-everything is in a sort of limbo, as the officers try to get the man to incriminate himself. The entire stop is both illegal and unlawful.
-they try to trick him into feeling responsible for backing up traffic when it's the immigration officers that are refusing to let him to go on his way without any cause.
-it becomes easy to see that internal checkpoints based on corporate statutes (and corporate statutes themselves) are voluntary.
-they are waiting for the author to incriminate himself or volunteer himself through some sort of agreement or consent into their assumption of jurisdiction.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDLlEh0x2XA
Limbo
-this video highlights well the state of limbo that we are in when we face these checkpoints. This is where if we know our natural rights, and natural person rights too, we know that officers at these checkpoints are just waiting for us to voluntarily identify ourselves as an
artificial person US citizen (slave) or to agree to their demands.
-notice the author simply says "Let me know when I am free to go." He says that without ever answering any of their questions.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHqpuVetLeo
-the state of limbo is where the fear factor comes in. Who is going to give in first? Are we going to be in fear and voluntarily submit to their demands, or are we going to ask the right questions and by doing so, force them to capitulate that they do not have jurisdiction without our agreement or consent, and arrive at the conclusion that there is no point to continue.
-the point is not to panic. You truly have to internalize that:
1. a man or woman can deny consent to be searched.
2. that there needs to be probable cause for a natural person of the Republic to be searched,
3. and that even for the artificial person NAME under corporate statutes of the UNITED STATES (or any country), there needs to be "reasonable suspicion" of probable cause that a statute was broken, in order for that legal entity to be searched.
WITH ANY POLICE OR OFFICER:
1. Get their full NAMES and ADDRESS OF BUSINESS.
2. Avoid answering any questions if you can. Ask questions instead.
-as Robert Menard points out in his videos, as long as you are ascertaining the purpose of things, you cannot be lawfully imposed upon.
2. Tell 'em you are a private man or woman if you have to, and not a person at law.
3. If they violate you, a commercial lien of your common law Name on their commercial NAME, listing any bond they have, and any private property, as surety.
No different from how to deal with current police or any checkpoints.
As long as there isn't a complete state of 'lawlessness' then it should work. I'm not even sure if the true common law of universal consent (Bouvier) is ever suspended when at a state of war. Probably not. Not for men and women. The de jure United States of America, the Constitutional Republic, otherwise known as the Common Law (big C big L) is a civil government in civil contract with natural persons and/or citizens of the Republic (legal entities representing the man or woman of a Constitutional Republic - see Chisholm v. Georgia). The current de facto United States (Organic Act of Washington DC 1871) is a corporation in civil contract with the artificial person created with Social Security. Martial law, a declared state of civil government, can't really affect the common law as far as I can tell... only the contract between the artificial political entities called governments, and natural and artificial persons at law (fictions at law, assumptions of who we are other than men and women under God). And it certainly can't affect the natural law where all men, women and children live under God.
According to Winston Shrout, the Constitution (a filing of bankruptcy of the original colonies) evaporated completely in 1999, but that doesn't stop people from commercial liens if necessary. The Constitution was basically a civil contract governing the common law, but separate from the common law itself. Since police states, and state of war, are both of civil, or admiralty law, and acting on persons at law, the true common law, and it's available protections, should still be in effect.
Contrary to what one might believe, being identified as a 'citizen' of the federal corporation UNITED STATES is not a good thing. Based upon the work of people like Robert-Arthur:Menard, Eric WhoRU, Randy Kelton and Marc Stevens, we know that the scope of power granted to government and public officials, by authority of The People, to perform any act on any individual is no more than the authority that one man/woman can have over that individual. By nature and by God, a man or woman cannot have authority over someone else. Ever. For natural persons at law, and artificial persons at law, both legal entity representations of men or corporations under civil government, assumptions are made that change things at law if we do not rebut them as living beings.
The jurisdiction of those acting through government/court/police positions is that job description, based on the Constitutional contract establishing the Common Law of the land of Probable Cause, to which they have sworn an oath to uphold. Thus those people working as government officials, courts and police cannot be granted the jurisdiction to act upon someone, anyone, without probable cause (a criminal affidavit by one of The People, charging a violation of aright and evidence supporting this charge) that a crime has already occurred, as originated by someone asking for those working for government to act on his/her behalf. In other words, the jurisdiction of those acting for government and on behalf of The People (the natural persons - real men and women in the society of the Republic) is to uphold the law of the land. And this jurisdiction, this power, to act upon someone alleged to have committed a crime against us or our property can come only from one of The People, which occurs when we file a criminal complaint alleging a violation of a right.
So no man, woman or child, and no property, can fall under the jurisdiction of those working for government without their consent. All function of a man in society must be by consent (See Chisholm v. Georgia). Jurisdiction is only the power granted to government, courts, or police by a natural person accuser, and claimed against another natural person of the Republic. It's only with a sworn affidavit from someone, and with evidence supporting a probable cause of injury to a person, that they can be granted the jurisdiction on behalf of The People to seize those accused, or to seize things that are involved in the violation of an accuser's God-given rights. It is not within the scope of the power granted to them for those working on behalf of the government to detain or arrest any natural "person" or anything to which they have not been granted jurisdiction through probable cause decision by a magistrate and a 'lawful warrant'.
It is my understanding that traveling freely on the land is a privilege granted by God to all men and women, as well as an absolute, natural and common law right for natural persons of "civil" common law contracts such as the Constitution for the United States of America, (not a privilege granted by government), protected by the true common law of universal agreement, and also the civil contract of Common Law of Constitution Republics on natural persons at law. It is not unless we volunteer ourselves to act act in commerce as a legal entity artificial person registered with a NAME that looks like ours - the all caps straw man - in admiralty law of corporate governments, with a driver's licence for our body, and a registration for our cars, that we fall under the assumption of being in a jurisdiction of the commercial/admiralty nature of government. (ie: speeding, DUI, checkpoints). And even this assumption is unlawful without our agreement and consent.
Officers have the duty to identify themselves to men and women when asked for us to be able to ascertain the purpose of the stop. This changes for 'persons at law' depending on the statutes of the state or provincial jurisdiction. During any stop, regular or checkpoint, contrary to what we have been taught to believe, they have not already been granted jurisdiction to detain or arrest anyone on the road who has not submitted themselves to their commercial jurisdiction,if a violation of a right has not been committed to which they have a lawful warrant signed by a magistrate (a complaint and evidence submitted to a magistrate to determine probable cause). Searches and seizures on 'persons at law' must be done by lawful warrant fulfilling lawful criteria. Men and women can deny consent to be searched, or waive that benefit.
There is no lawful authority for anyone in government to oblige a man or woman to show IDentification. There are limited times, without probable cause, when police can ask someone under the assumption of being a 'person' at law (Terry Stops etc...) for their Name only, and it's an 'obligation' to give it.
COMMERCIAL LIENS (enforcement of commercial claims of injury against us):
LIENS (Commercial vs Statutory) and LEVIES of bonds and private property of police.
-commercial liens are of the Common Law and are more powerful that statutory liens in admiralty jurisdiction. Attorneys and government officials would prefer you do not know about these liens.
-are done on the commercial title to something such as a policeman's bond or his private property.
-the person you are liening better have a bond, or you can lien their private property.
-liens are a claim.... versus a levy on the surety that you are claiming for damages.
-these liens differ from statutory suing, or liens under statutory law, because they are filled out in affidavit form under full commercial liability as a man or natural person.
-we lien, as a natural person Upper and Lower case name, the all caps NAMES of those who violate us, or companies and corporations including police, attorneys, judges and government officials.
-government corporations and police and judges acting as corporate officials are civilly DEAD entities so....
-a lien of a commercial title by a natural person of the Common Law is superior to a statutory lien by a corporation on a commercial title.
-we can place liens on the NAMES, or the Names, of public officials, banks,
attorneys, firms, for a) torts or b) breech of contract.
-strict liability commercial liens from the Common Law can only be over ridden by a Common Law jury, unless we release the lien ourselves.
-commercial liens are placed on the legal title to things (all caps NAMES of persons, NAMES of property)
-we can use commercial liens to secure the legal title to property that we
already have (the title that is co-owned by government and that gives
them a legal claim to the property)
-we can use commercial liens to arrest the public hazard bonds, or private property of public officials who are violating our legal rights as men and women, or as natural persons at the Common Law.
-if they don't have bonds then we can lien their private property
COMMERCIAL LIENS (how to enforce injury we endure)
A] Affidavit of Obligation (give 3 days for response)
-we are certifying to the truth of the thing.
-done under full commercial liability as a man or woman.
-sent by registered mail.
-this will become the law of the contract upon which they will default.
-usually they do not respond.
-when they do it is usually as a legal corporate DEAD entity and any "facts" contained therein are not facts at the Common Law.
1] Parties involved
-Claimant: the Upper and Lower case name (as us) doing business as ALL CAPS NAME (we use).
-Debtor: the NAME or Name of the person you are claiming against.
-their business NAME.
-or their Upper and Lower case name (the man who violated us) doing business as ALL CAPS NAME (their artificial person, or, all caps officer they work as, or, all caps district attorney they work as, or, all caps CEO of company they work as.. etc).
2] Proof of the allegation.
-is their non-response.
-their non-response to our notarized presentments of allegations is the proof.
3] Ledgering/Accounting
-monetary value of injury
4] What will be the surety
-eg: his public hazard bond
-private property
-all real property
5] Certification
-I do hereby certify upon my full commercial liability that the above is true complete and correct.
6] Signature
7] Proof of Mailing
-proof of mailing, and contents mailed, and the return receipt.
B] Notice of Fault/Opportunity to Cure (give 3 days for response)
C] Notice of Default (give 3 days for response)
-a Notice of default is ex-parte
-ie: we do not have to send them a copy of this
Levy
-after a lien has been secured we can collect from the insurance company that holds a public officials bond, or indemnify (hold harmless) and appoint a peace officer to levy the private property of the public or agency official in question.
Co-Claimants
Witnessing
-two or three private verifiers is equivalent to a prothonotary.