Log in

View Full Version : Galenika test " blue dots" any one tryed them, need info for next cycle!!!



neufie96
16-12-2011, 06:29 PM
just planning my next cycle and i just recieved 40 galenika test amps, 4 vials of EQ 300mg, 300 British Dispensary 5mg pinkies, 2- bottles of aromasin

was planning

600-750mg galenika test amps week
600mg EQ week
40mg dbol ED
12.5mg aromasin

PCT
hcg,nova,clomid

I have never used any human grade gear befor so wanted to try it out....what should i expect from the galenika"s matched with everything else......any comments would be great....thanks

cog
16-12-2011, 06:33 PM
Your doctor is pretty generous.

neufie96
16-12-2011, 06:57 PM
but COSTLY!!!

Mr Ontario
16-12-2011, 08:21 PM
Give it 3-4 weeks or sooner for some and you will see. I will take Human Grade Test any day over underground.

test_for_life
17-12-2011, 01:43 AM
VERY high quality test. If you've never used HG test before. You will be very satisfied. It's a whole different world :)

Hosehead
18-12-2011, 12:27 AM
Post up some pics of your Galenikas. I have had two different batches of them in the past, one being noticeably better than the other. I still have some of the 'lesser' quality amps on hand . I'll post up a pic tomorrow.

And yeah, if they are real Galenikas they are very good. I got off on 500mg with nothing else in my cycle.

1488
03-01-2012, 02:31 AM
lot numbers?

cog
03-01-2012, 06:03 AM
What is the potency of these real McCoys versus "off the shelf".?:)

Mr Ontario
03-01-2012, 07:53 AM
they have worked wonders for me for the last 3 years :)

cog
03-01-2012, 02:04 PM
Test is test,right?We are talking simply more mg/ml?

test_for_life
03-01-2012, 05:18 PM
Test is test,right?We are talking simply more mg/ml?

Wrong. Test is not test from my experience. 250 mgs of quality HG test does not equal the same as poor quality HG test. Real human grade quality test if felt within 24 hrs and NOT 2 weeks. 250 mgs of HG quality test will get you FAR better results than 500 mgs of poor quality test. It's like saying all steak is the same. But quality steak makes a huge difference just like quality test.

cog
04-01-2012, 08:52 AM
You must be talking about middle eastern or something.Any studies?

vanskelig
04-01-2012, 11:44 PM
Wrong. Test is not test from my experience. 250 mgs of quality HG test does not equal the same as poor quality HG test. Real human grade quality test if felt within 24 hrs and NOT 2 weeks. 250 mgs of HG quality test will get you FAR better results than 500 mgs of poor quality test. It's like saying all steak is the same. But quality steak makes a huge difference just like quality test.

NO, I'm pretty sure the testosterone molecule that your body loves so much doesn't change shape or taste any better because it was made in a lab or someones bathtub, pretty much, actual, real, milligram for milligram, its all the same.

natenator
05-01-2012, 07:56 AM
Wrong. Test is not test from my experience. 250 mgs of quality HG test does not equal the same as poor quality HG test. Real human grade quality test if felt within 24 hrs and NOT 2 weeks. 250 mgs of HG quality test will get you FAR better results than 500 mgs of poor quality test. It's like saying all steak is the same. But quality steak makes a huge difference just like quality test.
Unfortunately, from a pure science perspectiveyou are incorrect. Test is test

That said, what changes the game a little is that pharma actually does QA testing on products therefore you're likely getting bang on product with quality powder to begin with and then factor in processing. UG methods lack compared to pharma methods so things can go wrong in the processing into a finished product, over cooking for example.

The powder and processing quality is what i believe makes the difference between UG and Pharma but those things being equal, test is test.

cog
05-01-2012, 09:28 AM
Unfortunately, from a pure science perspectiveyou are incorrect. Test is test

That said, what changes the game a little is that pharma actually does QA testing on products therefore you're likely getting bang on product with quality powder to begin with and then factor in processing. UG methods lack compared to pharma methods so things can go wrong in the processing into a finished product, over cooking for example.

The powder and processing quality is what i believe makes the difference between UG and Pharma but those things being equal, test is test.

So the result of inferior powder or overcooking is simply less yield....

natenator
05-01-2012, 10:15 AM
So the result of inferior powder or overcooking is simply less yield....

Potency might be a netter word but yeah, perhaps.

Keep in mind i have nothing but an opinion to float thos difference but seems like a reasonable one.

Praetorian
05-01-2012, 10:37 AM
If we discount the quality control issue for now then the only difference between various testosterone's is the half life which is determined by the ester. The ester also determines how much testosterone you will get in say a given 100mg dose...its not all testosterone because some room has to be made for the ester itself ie test prop will yield about 80mg per 100mg and test cyp will yield about 70mg per 100mg. In the case of test suspension which does not have an ester you get 100mg of testosterone per 100mg.
Other than that they are basically the same...as for quality control pharm grade will be the defacto standard but thats not to say some UG grade tests are not as potent...it all depends on the quality of raw prouct the UG is using as well as how much they are actually putting in a vial when they call it 250mg/ml...did they actually use the required mg's of test powder to make that solution or did they use less to reap higher profits. So quality control comes down to the reputation of the UG. As for saying pharm test you will feel it in 24hrs...that is incorrect...feeling the test is determined by half life not by quality.
P