View Full Version : Eq/test combo
brandt
11-05-2010, 09:16 PM
Hey guys and girls anybody here try or heard of eq/test combo?
Ritch
11-05-2010, 09:21 PM
read.
the.
rules.
Highlited.
in.
yellow.
i did, ran it at low dose of in the past of Equipoise and test, i was doing 300 test and 200 equipoise..I gained only 8 pound on a 3-4 month cycle, but I was only getting ready for a BJJ tournament, and I had to stay within my weight class.. My blood pressure was a little high at the end of the cycle, but everything else was great.
read.
the.
rules.
Highlited.
in.
yellow.
is he not just asking about running a blend of equipoise and test? is this agains the rules really?
Ritch
11-05-2010, 09:31 PM
is he not just asking about running a blend of equipoise and test? is this agains the rules really?
Oooops, what was I thinking? If that`s what he`s saying, then he should rephrase his question before this thread gets deleted.
rob66679
11-05-2010, 10:07 PM
Oooops, what was I thinking? If that`s what he`s saying, then he should rephrase his question before this thread gets deleted.
Yeah...Its a fine line sometimes lol.
That is a brand name though.
brandt
11-05-2010, 11:37 PM
lol. yes I was just asking the blend question...thanks for the reply..
rob66679
12-05-2010, 12:00 AM
I'm curious myself, not sure how a concentration that high will feel the day after.
Def really interested, for sure.
I'm curious myself, not sure how a concentration that high will feel the day after.
Def really interested, for sure.
i had no soreness using a 450mg/ml but again i was only using 0.6cc eod
aas inj pain is a very idividual thing... some batches (high or low dose) KILL people while others are good to go
ive only had 1 super painful shot in my life, 1st tren ace shot of the cycle... felt like a hot poker got shoved in my glute and jiggled around..every shot after that (using the same supp) was smoooooth
ironwill
12-05-2010, 08:28 AM
Oooops, what was I thinking? If that`s what he`s saying, then he should rephrase his question before this thread gets deleted.
Werd to big bird, It is a brand name, should be re-worded IMO!!!:D
yes im a goodie 2 shoes........one is broken though...
MuSuLPhReAk
12-05-2010, 08:59 AM
Edited the thread title.
brandt
13-05-2010, 12:03 AM
Thanks for clearing that up for me MuSuLPhReAk....damn, hard to type your name..
rob66679
13-05-2010, 05:51 PM
i did, ran it at low dose of in the past of Equipoise and test, i was doing 300 test and 200 equipoise..I gained only 8 pound on a 3-4 month cycle, but I was only getting ready for a BJJ tournament, and I had to stay within my weight class.. My blood pressure was a little high at the end of the cycle, but everything else was great.
So my next question would be did that acheive better results than test only....I have done a test only cycle and had great results @ 500 a week.
So I'm kind of torn between 750 @ week of test or maybe a 500/400 test and EQ cycle.
There seems to be some debate about if EQ is worth running at less than around 600/week, and if the test or EQ should be at the higher does during the cycle.
Any feedback from the vets would be appreciated.
ironwill
13-05-2010, 06:00 PM
i am no longer a fan of eq....Ive run it over and over to find if i cut out eq, and throw in half the amnt of deca, or NPP, i see and feel much better results......Ive run it for 16 weks last run, and went off for my pct etc, came back with 375 of test e, and 300 of NPP, and the strength, and well being and even appetite are so much higher......This is me, far to many folks love eq to say its a bad drug, but i dont seem to respond well to it....Maybe its because im part horse???lolol
Ritch
13-05-2010, 06:12 PM
Maybe its because im part horse???lolol
That would explain the flies alaways buzzing around your ass! :moon
GYMBRAT
13-05-2010, 06:15 PM
I ran 750mgs wk eq for 20 wks along with 750mgs wk test e and really noticed and felt the eq, so I'm all for it :)
GYMBRAT
13-05-2010, 06:16 PM
That would explain the flies alaways buzzing around your ass! :moon
yes and his poor lil tail wont shoo them away :D:D
Ritch
13-05-2010, 06:19 PM
yes and his poor lil tail wont shoo them away :D:D
Funny! :greet
ironwill
13-05-2010, 06:35 PM
holy, 2 zingers in a row.....lol...funny guys youse guyses are....
GB, what do you notice extra on eq, rather than test alone at that dose???
rob66679
14-05-2010, 08:57 PM
holy, 2 zingers in a row.....lol...funny guys youse guyses are....
GB, what do you notice extra on eq, rather than test alone at that dose???
Good question. And how would you compare it to deca as an add on? Deca sides are kinda scarin me lol.
ive been really wondering if my deca is real, I am not getting any sides at 450 a week
rob66679
14-05-2010, 11:19 PM
ive been really wondering if my deca is real, I am not getting any sides at 450 a week
Interesting. How long you been on? The vets could probably tell ya if its bunk or not.
From what I've read deca is probably the hardest to recover from besides maybe tren. The whole erectile issues thing doesn't sound fun.
I was thinking about EQ because it kinda looked like most of the deca benefits without as many sides?
gicantor
15-05-2010, 02:08 AM
ive been really wondering if my deca is real, I am not getting any sides at 450 a week
how long have you been on?
chan_ho_nam
15-05-2010, 02:13 AM
I love EQ. My cardio goes up from the increased RB count, my joints feel great and I'm very vascular. I usually like to get a good T400 and cut that with 300mg of EQ/week.
how long have you been on?
5 weeks, My weight is 5-8lbs higher, and I have acne.. I am running it with 100mg/week of test decaonate. My blood pressure did not change from before my cycle. I do look a lot fuller tho. But my sex drive is really high, but its really hard for me to ejaculate when having sex. Erection strength is fine.
I did EQ in the past with test and really loved it.. very little side effects beside blood pressure..
gicantor
15-05-2010, 03:51 PM
5 weeks, My weight is 5-8lbs higher, and I have acne.. I am running it with 100mg/week of test decaonate. My blood pressure did not change from before my cycle. I do look a lot fuller tho. But my sex drive is really high, but its really hard for me to ejaculate when having sex. Erection strength is fine.
I'd say its legit then.
gicantor
15-05-2010, 03:55 PM
Interesting. How long you been on? The vets could probably tell ya if its bunk or not.
From what I've read deca is probably the hardest to recover from besides maybe tren. The whole erectile issues thing doesn't sound fun.
I was thinking about EQ because it kinda looked like most of the deca benefits without as many sides?
Personally I don't like EQ. It's not worth the extra cash and I got really bad anxiety.....or something. I just felt on edge all the time it was weird maybe from the raised BP i don't know. I couldn't even finish 10 weeks at 600mg.
TryGear
15-05-2010, 05:50 PM
Would appreciate more feedback from those experianced with eq/test cycles. I'm considering a cycle similar.
first time i did eq i had pressure on my chest for the first 3 weeks.. anxiety related i believe, and I was quite nervous all the time during the cycle.
rob66679
16-05-2010, 03:25 PM
Personally I don't like EQ. It's not worth the extra cash and I got really bad anxiety.....or something. I just felt on edge all the time it was weird maybe from the raised BP i don't know. I couldn't even finish 10 weeks at 600mg.
How much test did you run it with?
Anybody have any feedback on what the minimum dosage and duration for EQ is? Lot of guys say it doesn't even kick in for 10 weeks or so....and you have to take at least 600/week?
You didn't even go 10 weeks because of the sides..... everybodys different I guess.
TryGear
16-05-2010, 03:54 PM
From what I've been reading. 400 minimum/wk. 600 much better. Over 600 not worth it. And shoul be using more test than eq...ie 400 eq 600 test per wk.
And I've read that most notice it kick in about week 6 or 7
but this is all from google searches not experiance
rob66679
16-05-2010, 09:02 PM
From what I've been reading. 400 minimum/wk. 600 much better. Over 600 not worth it. And shoul be using more test than eq...ie 400 eq 600 test per wk.
And I've read that most notice it kick in about week 6 or 7
but this is all from google searches not experiance
I was looking on another forum and there is a poll thats EQ vs Deca.
Its pretty much split, I guess some people react differently to different compounds. Some of those guys are doing more EQ than Test though, and some are saying at least 10 weeks to see any benefit.
TryGear
17-05-2010, 07:40 AM
Guess one will just have to try it and judge for themselves.
rob66679
17-05-2010, 03:06 PM
Guess one will just have to try it and judge for themselves.
Kinda lookin that way.
The increased cardio is really appealing to me..... Lot of MMA and Boxers have tested positive apparently.
Kinda lookin that way.
The increased cardio is really appealing to me..... Lot of MMA and Boxers have tested positive apparently.
i did run EQ for that cardio benefits, but my blood pressure was much higher, now i am running deca at 450 with 100mg of test a week and my cardio is MUCH better than while i was on EQ
rob66679
17-05-2010, 08:44 PM
i did run EQ for that cardio benefits, but my blood pressure was much higher, now i am running deca at 450 with 100mg of test a week and my cardio is MUCH better than while i was on EQ
Interesting. The deca sides still scare the hell out of me though.
Interesting. The deca sides still scare the hell out of me though.
i have a lot more acnee from deca that i had on EQ. But i dont notice anything else...
rob66679
18-05-2010, 01:07 AM
i have a lot more acnee from deca that i had on EQ. But i dont notice anything else...
The affects on your junk.... The long recovery time......the super long detection time....2 years I think.
TryGear
18-05-2010, 05:15 PM
yeah as for detection times, I've been doing alot of research on that and basically all sites say the same thing, the only problem is how current the information is? so with advances in detections? are the lists even reliable???
rob66679
18-05-2010, 11:39 PM
yeah as for detection times, I've been doing alot of research on that and basically all sites say the same thing, the only problem is how current the information is? so with advances in detections? are the lists even reliable???
The consensus on Deca seems to be its the longest by far.... I think EQ might be second though.
IMHO the lists are pretty reliable for detection times, if anything detecting is getting better.
TryGear
18-05-2010, 11:51 PM
that's what I mean detecting is getting better but the lists of various detection times haven't changed in years.....hopefully when they were originally made they allowed for some growth "pardon the pun"
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.1 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.