What do you think???

[madeouttaice]

I dont post much, because I try to read as much as I can and absorb much information asI can before I open my mouth about something I have no knowldege of. As a user of novice in the use of aas, I'm still broadening my horizons, but I have a serious question. I know fully well that the use of gh at my age would do me no good whatsoever (23) and more of a waste of money. But I had read an article/post on ssb last year of a theory someone had had. I'm not sure of his name but Ill refer to him as "some guy". Basically it had stated that using synthol to site enhance, gh/igf to create new muscle cells within the site, and then aas to mature the muscle. That being said, for those for or against synthol and dont believe in such a thing as site enhancing, could I benefit from a theory such as this if it makes any sense, or if you find it at all valid. Or would I be better just cycling, because I thought it could work. Let me know what you think....

[Boost]

using synthol to site enhance, gh/igf to create new muscle cells within the site, and then aas to mature the muscle.....


Synthol adds size via oil injection. Gh then adds additional size by creating new muscle cells and then the aas to make all of those cells bigger. I don't see the benefit of the synthol unless synthol somehow helps the gh make more cells because of the bigger area created by the oil.

I think it's retarded but im not a scientist.

[madeouttaice]

yea i understand that, but does it matter if i use gh for that purpose and will it have any effect seeing that im young?

[Demonwolf]

For a young feller to notice real nice benefit from HGH, they have to run a much higher [read less safe] dosage.

[tripleA]

23 is too young for gh use. Your body is making enough on it's own.

[Boost]

i love gh. It's far safer from a medical standpoint than testosterone at any age.


gh is "thought" to produce cancer quicker and easier than steroids as it creates new permenant cells in the body where steroids only make your cells bigger.

This is what I read a few yrs ago. Could be crap or it could be true. Nobody knows for certain. If this is possibly true then your above post is not necessairly correct.

If you use steroids in a safe manner they could be safer than gh even though steroids actually have more side effects.

[Rrrrolla]

I have since read that the correlation between gh and concer is only that malignant tumours release ALOT of igf, this is why they grow so fast. However, to say that because a tumour creates IGF, does not mean that IGF creates tumours. The IGF that causes a tumour to grow so fast is being released from the tumour itself, not from the outside. At least that's what I heard...